Association of Operative Approach With Postoperative Outcomes in Neonates Undergoing Surgical Repair of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula
Timestops (1)
Tools Used
Topic Overview
Key Takeaways
- Minimally invasive EA/TEF repair has higher re-intervention rates vs open surgery (thoracoscopy, chest tubes, endoscopy required).
- Operating time is longer for minimally invasive approach in neonatal EA/TEF repair.
- Overall morbidity is similar between open and minimally invasive EA/TEF repair techniques.
- Study analyzed 1,700 neonates from NSQIP database (2013-2020) comparing surgical approaches for EA/TEF.
- No clear superiority of minimally invasive surgery for neonatal EA/TEF despite theoretical benefits.
Keywords
Hashtags
Transcript
Which surgical approach has better outcomes for patients with esophageal atresia EA and tracheoesophageal fistula TEF open surgery or minimally invasive surgery? I'm Lizzie Lee from Cincinnati Children's Hospital, and this is an article you should know about. This retrospective study looked at 1700 neonates in the Nisquip pediatric database who had EA and TEF repairs from 2013 to 2020. They found that compared with open surgery, the minimally evasive approach for neonates with EA and TEF is associated with higher rates of re-interventions and a longer operating time, but there was no difference in morbidity between the two. Re-intervention included thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, chest and feeding tube placement, and endoscopy. Let us know what you think in the comments below and stay tuned for more articles that you should know about.