Post Operative Anal Dilatations for the Prevention of Anal Strictures in Children With Anorectal Malformation: A Systematic Review
Timestops (4)
Tools Used
Topic Overview
Key Takeaways
- Stricture rates after anorectal malformation surgery vary widely (0-40%) despite routine anal dilatation protocols like PANIA.
- Alternative approaches including weekly dilatations or omitting dilatations entirely show similar outcomes to traditional protocols.
- Current evidence lacks high-quality data proving routine post-operative anal dilatations are necessary for stricture prevention.
- Decades-old practice of routine dilatations may not be evidence-based; randomized controlled trials are needed.
- Clinical practice variation suggests opportunity to reduce patient burden if dilatations prove unnecessary.
Keywords
Hashtags
Transcript
After reconstructed surgery for anorectal malformations, dilatations are routine, but are they actually necessary? I'm Lizzy Lee from Cincinnati Children's and this is an article you should know about. Since the 1980s, routine anal dilatations after surgery for anorectal malformations have been standard. But this new study showed that stricture rates range from 0 to almost 40 percent, even with the classic PANIA protocol. In addition, alternative methods like weekly dilatations or even skipping dilatations altogether showed similar outcomes. So there isn't enough high quality evidence proving that dilatations are actually necessary. Bottom line, we might have been doing this for decades without really needing to, and we need more randomized trials to settle the debate. Let us know what you think in the comments below and stay tuned for more articles that you should know about.