DEV ENVIRONMENT — dev.library.globalcastmd.com — Changes here do not affect production
2 Views
0 Likes
0 Shares
0 Comments
Read article ↗

StayCurrentMD

View profile →

Article

Non-operative Versus Operative Management of Perianal Abscess in Infants: A 10-year Retrospective Study at Two Centres in the United Kingdom

Published: Reading: 1 min

Topic overview

This retrospective study compares surgical versus non-surgical approaches for managing perianal abscesses in infants, addressing the lack of evidence-based guidelines in current practice. The research evaluates outcomes between incision-drainage under general anaesthesia and conservative treatments like antibiotics or aspiration.

Key takeaways

  • Perianal abscess in infants can be managed non-operatively with antibiotics/aspiration, avoiding general anaesthesia risks.
  • Current treatment choice between operative and non-operative management is based on surgeon preference, not strong evidence.
  • This 10-year retrospective study compares outcomes between surgical drainage and conservative management in infant perianal abscess.
  • Fistula-in-ano may occur with or without perianal abscess in the infant population.

Keywords

Hashtags

Full article text

Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Non-operative Versus Operative Management of Perianal Abscess in Infants: A 10-year Retrospective Study at Two Centres in the United Kingdom. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2024-12-10. https://dev.library.globalcastmd.com/article/9513?via_space=staycurrentmd

Comments

Loading comments...