DEV ENVIRONMENT — dev.library.globalcastmd.com — Changes here do not affect production
0 Views
0 Likes
0 Shares
0 Comments
Read article ↗

StayCurrentMD

View profile →

Article

Minimal invasive duodenal atresia repair – does surgical technique of anastomosis matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Published: Reading: 1 min

Topic overview

This systematic review compares diamond-shaped versus side-to-side anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic duodenal atresia repair. While diamond-shaped anastomosis is the open surgery gold standard, side-to-side has gained traction in minimally invasive approaches, prompting evaluation of outcomes and complications between these techniques.

Key takeaways

  • Minimally invasive duodenal atresia repair has been widely adopted since 2001, offering an alternative to traditional open surgery.
  • Diamond-shaped anastomosis remains the gold standard in open repair, but side-to-side anastomosis is increasingly used laparoscopically.
  • No prior comprehensive review has compared anastomotic techniques specifically for minimally invasive duodenal atresia repair.
  • This meta-analysis directly compares diamond-shaped versus side-to-side anastomosis outcomes in laparoscopic duodenal atresia cases.
  • Understanding which anastomotic technique yields better outcomes can guide surgical decision-making in neonatal duodenal obstruction.

Keywords

Hashtags

Full article text

Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Minimal invasive duodenal atresia repair – does surgical technique of anastomosis matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2025-07-29. https://dev.library.globalcastmd.com/article/10744?via_space=staycurrentmd

Comments

Loading comments...