Musculoskeletal outcomes following thoracoscopic versus conventional open repair of esophageal atresia: A systematic review and meta-analysis from pediatric surgery meta-analysis (PESMA) study group
Topic overview
This meta-analysis compares long-term musculoskeletal outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent thoracoscopic versus open repair of esophageal atresia. The study evaluates whether minimally invasive thoracoscopic techniques reduce the incidence of chest wall deformities and scoliosis compared to traditional open approaches.
Key takeaways
- Thoracic musculoskeletal deformities are a recognized long-term complication following esophageal atresia repair.
- Thoracoscopic repair may reduce musculoskeletal sequelae compared to conventional open repair, though evidence remains limited.
- Potential benefits of thoracoscopic approach include earlier recovery, reduced pain, and improved cosmetic outcomes.
- Long-term musculoskeletal outcomes should be considered when selecting surgical approach for esophageal atresia.
- Systematic review evidence is needed to guide surgical decision-making between thoracoscopic and open repair techniques.
Keywords
Hashtags
Full article text
Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Musculoskeletal outcomes following thoracoscopic versus conventional open repair of esophageal atresia: A systematic review and meta-analysis from pediatric surgery meta-analysis (PESMA) study group. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2025-06-26. https://dev.library.globalcastmd.com/article/10616?via_space=staycurrentmd
Comments